Re: glr: include the created header

[Joel E. Denny]

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:

> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> I guess this didn't help.  How about %before-defines and %after-defines?  
> 
> "%before-definitions" and "%after-definitions" might be a bit clearer,

That's fine.

> (if anything in this area could be considered to be clear :-).

If there are no specific objections raised in the next day or so, I'll 
commit the above.

For a moment there, I thought both you and Akim were in favor of the first 
patch again, but I hope not.

Joel