[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: symbol declarations after rules
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: symbol declarations after rules |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:46:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> Just to make sure I'm being clear: before the first %union, a prologue
> block would have the same function as %before-header does anywhere.
> After that %union, a prologue block would have the same function as
> %after-header does anywhere.
I'm a bit lost. But I guess you're saying we'd have the following
types of code blocks (other than rule actions)
%union
%{
%before-header
%after-header
%before-definitions
%after-definitions
%% (after rules)
and, except for %%, you can jumble things up any which way, but the
output order will always be -- what?
Sorry, but this is all still sounding pretty complicated. Can't we
simplify it somehow?
- symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/23
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/23
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/23
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/27
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/26
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/26
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/27