[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Oct 2006 03:57:09 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > 1. %code{...} is the most common place for parser implementation code. In
> > C/C++, it goes in the code file. In Java, it goes in the parser class.
> >
> > 2. %requires{...} is a place to put dependency code for externally exposed
> > definitions required by Bison. In C/C++, it's for dependencies of YYSTYPE
> > and YYLTYPE. In Java, it's for import directives.
> >
> > 3. %provides{...} is a place for additional externally exposed definitions.
> > In C/C++, it goes at the bottom of the header file so that it can depend on
> > YYSTYPE, YYLTYPE, and yytokentype. In Java, I suppose it could be used to
> > define other package-visible classes in the same java file.
> >
> This would be completely ok.
Great. Paul? Akim?
> For Java, %provides and the epilogue would be
> synonyms.
Given that Java draws no distinction between a header file and a code
file, that result seems intuitive, so I think it's ok.
- [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/10/05
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/10/05
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/10/14
- Re: [PATCH] more on prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/03