Re: [updated PATCH] %language declaration

[Joel E. Denny]

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

> The main objection was that other people might then think about
> language-dependent parsing of the Bison skeleton (for example, as in Perl,
> because of clashes between the "$N"/"@N" variables, and the internal syntax of
> the language).

What's wrong with that?  Couldn't it prove to be necessary in order to 
support some languages?  If you would prefer to point me to a previous 
post, that's fine.