[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: push parser
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: push parser |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Dec 2006 01:39:14 -0500 (EST) |
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Bob Rossi wrote:
> If you have a lot of patches that make up the final patch, you should
> run the final patch through the benchmark script we were using. Just to
> make sure that all of the new modes don't effect the speed of the
> pure/unpure pull parsers.
Thanks for that suggestion. What do you think of the attached uncommitted
patch? Also attached are the results that I get from etc/bench.pl after
applying all of this patch except the push.c portion. Finally, attached
are the results after applying all of the patch. Notice that, for pull
mode, switching from yacc.c to push.c has little impact. However, the
impact of switching to push mode is improved by this patch.
push-bench-patch
Description: Binary data
results-old
Description: Text document
results-move-state
Description: Text document
- Re: push parser, (continued)
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/19
- Re: push parser, Paul Eggert, 2006/12/19
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/19
- Re: push parser, Paul Eggert, 2006/12/20
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/20
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/20
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/20
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/20
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/20
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/23
- Re: push parser,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/26
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/26
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/26
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/26
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/27
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/27
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/27
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/27
- Re: push parser, Bob Rossi, 2006/12/31
- Re: push parser, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/31