[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level.
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level. |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:04:34 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Akim Demaille wrote:
> > It's just one new option:
> >
> > --force-define=NAME[=VALUE]
> >
> > And it would be straight-forward to implement.
>
> I guess I was confuses by references to %defines in the quoted thread, and I
> read "defines" in your suggestion. Which makes no sense since there is NAME
> in the argument, but I guess I was too tired to notice.
No problem. I shouldn't have distracted you with that.
> So, in short, yes, sure! :)
Great. Thanks. :)
> > > That in the end the question is: should the interface be tailored for
> > > experienced users, or novices. Both opinions are perfectly defendable,
> > > but we
> > > need to make our mind once on this regard, and be consistent afterwards.
> >
> > I'm surprised to see you argue this way after you recently supported the
> > "misleading reference" concept for Alex's value names.
>
> ISTR that there was one message with which I did not agree :( But I don't
> have the thread here.
I thought you and I were mostly in agreement by the end. If you think of
it, please remind me.
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Joel E. Denny, 2009/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Akim Demaille, 2009/04/10
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Joel E. Denny, 2009/04/10
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Akim Demaille, 2009/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Joel E. Denny, 2009/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Akim Demaille, 2009/04/08
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Joel E. Denny, 2009/04/09
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Akim Demaille, 2009/04/10
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level.,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [PATCH] Factor %FLAG at scan level., Joel E. Denny, 2009/04/17