[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??
|
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
|
Subject: |
Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))?? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:11:19 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:34:01AM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote:
> - for ((vl=$((v_level - 1)); $vl > 0; --vl))
The inside of the for ((...)) is already a math context. You don't need
another $((...)) inside it.
for ((vl = v_level - 1; vl > 0; --vl))
Or is that another "irrelevant detail"?
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Aharon Robbins, 2012/04/09
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Linda Walsh, 2012/04/09
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Chet Ramey, 2012/04/09
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Elliott Forney, 2012/04/10
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Chet Ramey, 2012/04/10
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Linda Walsh, 2012/04/11
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Linda Walsh, 2012/04/12
- Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/12
Re: status on $[arith] for eval arith vsl $((arith))??, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2012/04/08