[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash security issue
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bash security issue |
|
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:43:07 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.93 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:
> Overkill. The security hole arises because the problem, as it currently
> exists, is triggerable by ANY portable environment variable definition.
In the context of security you need to forget about portable. You need
to think about the improbable.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Bash security issue, (continued)
- Re: Bash security issue, Zack Weinberg, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Nick Bowler, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Eric Blake, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Nick Bowler, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Linda Walsh, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Eric Blake, 2014/09/26
- Re: Bash security issue, Linda Walsh, 2014/09/27
- Re: Bash security issue,
Andreas Schwab <=