[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:14:46 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:53:18PM -0700, Alexandre Ferrieux wrote:
> Of course, their intention is precisely expressed by the '#!/bin/sh' header
Unfortunately, most people don't actually express an intent when they
use #!/bin/sh. They just copy some code from a random script they found
somewhere, without understanding what it means.
The number of scripts that use #!/bin/sh but then go on to use Bash
syntax is higher than you might believe. Whether exported functions are
in that toolset, I couldn't say for sure, but it's likely. Even in the
#bash channel on IRC we have often advocated constructs like this:
myfunc() { ...; }
export -f myfunc
find . -type f -exec bash -c 'for f; do myfunc "$f"; done' _ {} +
(This is in response to "Why can't I do find -exec myfunc", which is
something of a frequently asked question.)
It's not a stretch of the imagination to suppose that someone has used
exported functions in a #!/bin/sh script on a Linux box where /bin/sh
is a symlink to bash.
- Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Alexandre Ferrieux, 2014/09/26
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Andreas Schwab, 2014/09/26
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Message not available
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Alexandre Ferrieux, 2014/09/26
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Chet Ramey, 2014/09/29
- Message not available
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Alexandre Ferrieux, 2014/09/29
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Chet Ramey, 2014/09/29
- Message not available
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Alexandre Ferrieux, 2014/09/29
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Chet Ramey, 2014/09/29
- Message not available
- Re: Detecting invocation as /bin/sh ?, Alexandre Ferrieux, 2014/09/30
Message not available