[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing
From: |
William Park |
Subject: |
Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:40:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 09:57:15AM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On 1/22/21 9:54 AM, Saint Michael wrote:
> > I vote for this new feature.
>
> Personally, I've found that scanf underpowered for parsing modern data
> formats. Bash's existing regular expression support seems perfectly adequate
> to me, and it can handle everything that scanf can. I'd only suggest
> extending the regular expression syntax with support for named subgroups.
Ah.. I forgot Bash now has regex. Just tried =~, and I can get the
subgroups out. Request withdrawn. :-)
--
William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca>
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, (continued)
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Chet Ramey, 2021/01/25
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/26
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Oğuz, 2021/01/26
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Greg Wooledge, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Léa Gris, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Léa Gris, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, Ángel, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing, pepa65, 2021/01/22
- Re: Feature Request: scanf-like parsing,
William Park <=