[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2024 09:10:40 -0500 |
At 2024-08-07T10:07:23-0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 8/6/24 12:25 PM, Koichi Murase wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/doc/bash.1 b/doc/bash.1
> > index 1f0a23d3..3ace21e9 100644
> > --- a/doc/bash.1
> > +++ b/doc/bash.1
> > @@ -2091,7 +2091,7 @@ the value returned upon subsequent
> > references is
> > the number of seconds since the assignment plus the value assigned.
> > The number of seconds at shell invocation and the current time are always
> > -determined by querying the system clock.
> > +determined by querying the system clock at the resolution of a second.
>
> This is not unreasonable.
At the risk of splitting hairs, I would cast the added phrase as:
"at a resolution of one second".
I think that's more idiomatic, but I might read too many kibitzers and
nit pickers.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/06
Re: Potentially misleading documentation of SECONDS variable, Ángel, 2024/08/06