[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@ |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:24:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 8/24/24 11:49 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
The bash manual says [1]:
*
($*) Expands to the positional parameters, starting
from one. When the expansion is not within double
quotes, each positional parameter expands to a
separate word. In contexts where it is performed,
those words are subject to further word splitting
and filename expansion.
I think "it is" here is ambiguous. It would be better to use "these
expansions are."
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, (continued)
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/22
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Greg Wooledge, 2024/08/22
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/23
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/26
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/26
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Robert Elz, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/26
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Robert Elz, 2024/08/25
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/26
Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/08/26