[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to mis
From: |
kirill at shutemov dot name |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols |
Date: |
13 Oct 2008 18:27:59 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From kirill at shutemov dot name 2008-10-13 18:27
-------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Subject: Re: binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so
> due to missing symbols
>
> Hi Kirill,
>
> > This change provokes text relocations.
>
> Sorry - please could you explain what that means and why it is undesirable ?
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/textrelocs.html
>
> > I guess, PIC version of libiberty.a should be used.
>
> A PIC version of libiberty is not normally generated even if configure
> with --enable-shared...
Yep, you are right. :(
Then I have no ideas how to fix it.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6937
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, (continued)
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/04
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/07
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/09
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/10
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, kirill at shutemov dot name, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols,
kirill at shutemov dot name <=
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ldv at altlinux dot org, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ldv at altlinux dot org, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2008/10/13
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2008/10/14
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/10/22
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/22
- [Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols, ps dot m at gmx dot net, 2008/10/22