[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefi
From: |
chris at seberino dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments |
Date: |
22 Jun 2009 22:50:04 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-06-22 22:50
-------
You said that the hex equivalent should be displayed for all immediate values
that are greater than 5 bits. I found some cases where larger immediate values
do not have the hex equivalent value shown.
For example, loads and stores use addressing mode 2 which has 12 bit immediate
values. Here are 2 stores (str) that don't have hex equivalents...
8: 14a4ff06 strtne pc, [r4], #3846
18: 858028dd strhi r2, [r0, #2269]
Here are 2 coprocessor loads and stores (addressing mode 5) with 8 bit
immediates that don't have hex equivalents...
3c: 4d7e6b9f ldclmi 11, cr6, [lr, #-636]!
174: 0ca40a81 stceq 10, cr0, [r4], #516
17c: 9d01082f stcls 8, cr0, [r1, #-188]
cs
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10297
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/10297] New: inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, chris at seberino dot org, 2009/06/18
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/06/19
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/06/19
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, chris at seberino dot org, 2009/06/19
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments,
chris at seberino dot org <=
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/06/23
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/06/23
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, chris at seberino dot org, 2009/06/23
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/06/24
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2009/06/29
- [Bug binutils/10297] inconsistencies in objdump's presentation of undefined's and comments, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/06/29