[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

[george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com]

------- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com  
2009-09-14 20:11 -------
Subject: RE:  GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

Thanks for the patch. I'll give it a try. The internet-Nazis on my end blocked 
simple.o for some reason (even though they didn't seem to block the .so). But 
then again, there seems to no rhyme nor reason to their methods; they even 
block Dilbert ;-))).

-----Original Message-----
From: nickc at redhat dot com [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 9:26 AM
To: Tovrea, George W (US SSA)
Subject: [Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores


------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-09-14 16:26 
-------
Hi Bill,

> Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile,

Because without it I have to create a compiler and then compile simple.cc.  Plus
I have to hope that I am using the same set of compiler sources as you and that
I have configured the compiler in the same way.

> but it and xerces 28 are attached

Well the simple.o file appears to be missing, but I had a go at creating one for
myself.  As a result I have created a workaround patch which *may* work.  Please
give it a go and see if it helps.  I am not familiar with this particular area
of the linker though, so this is definitely a workaround not a fix.

Cheers
  Nick




-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.