[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail
From: |
ian at airs dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:28:02 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12392
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2011-01-12 14:27:50
UTC ---
Passing the -t option to the linker will get you a complete list of all object
files and shared libraries that the linker includes in the link.
The warning about sys_errlist being deprecated suggests that your system is
going to generate a warning on any static link. At least, I don't see anything
in basic_static_test which would refer to errlist, so I think the reference
must be coming from libgcc or libc itself. Does the GNU linker give a warning
when linking with -static?
The error about __rel_iplt_start and __rel_iplt_end not being defined is very
odd. The 32-bit x86 linker always defines those when linking with -static.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gold/12392] New: Many static link tests fail, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, 2011/01/12
- [Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, 2011/01/12
- [Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, 2011/01/12
- [Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, 2011/01/12
- [Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail,
ian at airs dot com <=
- [Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, 2011/01/12
- [Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, 2011/01/12