[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/12534] New: arm: disassembly of pc-relative ldrd instructi
From: |
dave.martin at linaro dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/12534] New: arm: disassembly of pc-relative ldrd instructions not fully annotated in Thumb |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2011 11:38:32 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12534
Summary: arm: disassembly of pc-relative ldrd instructions not
fully annotated in Thumb
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: address@hidden
ReportedBy: address@hidden
The annotation of ldrd instructions in Thumb during
disassembly appears incomplete: the target label is not
annotated, whereas for ldr, or for ldr or ldrd in ARM, the
instruction is annotated with the target label in the
disassembly.
I believe the generated instruction encoding is right in the case
shown below, but it might be a good idea to double-check.
Cheers
---Dave
binutils$ cat <<EOF >ldr-tst.s
.syntax unified
.globl d
d: .quad 0
.type f, %function
f: ldrd r0, r1, d
nop
ldrd r0, r1, d
ldr r0, d
nop
ldr r0, d
EOF
binutils$ binutils/objdump -mthumb -o ldr-tst.o ldr-tst.s &&
arm-linux-gnueabi-objdump -dr ldr-tst.o
[...]
Disassembly of section .text:
00000000 <d>:
...
00000008 <f>:
8: e95f 0103 ldrd r0, r1, [pc, #-12]
*** bug?: no label annotated
c: 46c0 nop ; (mov r8, r8)
e: e95f 0104 ldrd r0, r1, [pc, #-16]
*** bug?: no label annotated
12: f85f 0014 ldr.w r0, [pc, #-20] ; 0 <d>
16: 46c0 nop ; (mov r8, r8)
18: f85f 001c ldr.w r0, [pc, #-28] ; 0 <d>
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug binutils/12534] New: arm: disassembly of pc-relative ldrd instructions not fully annotated in Thumb,
dave.martin at linaro dot org <=