[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/16807] New: Bad behavior with resources of Windows applica
From: |
angelo.graziosi at alice dot it |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/16807] New: Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64 |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Apr 2014 20:32:41 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
Bug ID: 16807
Summary: Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications
with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64
Product: binutils
Version: 2.24
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: angelo.graziosi at alice dot it
Created attachment 7528
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7528&action=edit
The tar-ball containing the source of test case
It seems that the attached test case does not work rightly with current
binutils [1] on Cygwin64 (but probably is a general issue regarding all Windows
applications).
The Help menu in the test case contains two About items, and About2 is created
from About1 with Copy/Paste. Now, while clicking on About1 works as expected,
the click on About2 does not produce anything and fails. If I comment out the
FILE_EXIT stuff (from .c, .h and .rc files) the issue is for About1 and not for
About2 (it "swapped"!).
If, as binutils, I use the old binutils-2.23.52-5.tar.bz2 package, all works as
expected.
I can reproduce the issue also with the current mingw-w64 binutils [2] (and the
relative mingw-w64 compilers, i686-w64-mingw32, x86_64-w64-mingw32).
The issue does not exist using mingw-binutils-2.23.1-1 (i686-pc-mingw32).
The attached tar-ball can be used in this way:
$ tar -xvf test_case_b.tar.bz2
$ cd test_case_b
$ ./dlg_one.out
To create the test case I have adapted an application found on the web.
Consider that I discovered the issue with a more complicated Fortran
application.
Ciao,
Angelo.
P.S. See also the thread on Cygwin list:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-04/msg00016.html
----
[1] binutils-2.24.51-2
[2] mingw64-i686-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1,
mingw64-x86_64-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/16807] New: Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64,
angelo.graziosi at alice dot it <=
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, yselkowitz at cygwin dot com, 2014/04/04
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2014/04/04
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, angelo.graziosi at alice dot it, 2014/04/07
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2014/04/11
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2014/04/11
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, angelo.graziosi at alice dot it, 2014/04/11
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2014/04/23
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, angelo.graziosi at alice dot it, 2014/04/24
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2014/04/24
- [Bug ld/16807] Bad behavior with resources of Windows applications with recent binutils upgrade on Cygwin64, nickc at redhat dot com, 2014/04/24