[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/13302] IRELATIVE relocation should come last
From: |
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/13302] IRELATIVE relocation should come last |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 22:15:23 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13302
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <address@hidden>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5e2ac45d561dffec63af4c83a545b46db032c70c
commit 5e2ac45d561dffec63af4c83a545b46db032c70c
Author: H.J. Lu <address@hidden>
Date: Sat Sep 2 07:37:05 2017 -0700
x86: Add _bfd_x86_elf_size_dynamic_sections
elf_i386_size_dynamic_sections and elf_x86_64_size_dynamic_sections are
very similar, except for the followings:
1. elf_i386_size_dynamic_sections checks GOT_TLS_IE and GOT_TLS_IE_BOTH.
elf_x86_64_size_dynamic_sections checks only GOT_TLS_IE. Since
GOT_TLS_IE_BOTH is never true for x86-64, it is OK to check GOT_TLS_IE
for both i386 and x86-64.
2, x86-64 sets tlsdesc_plt, but i386 doesn't. We set tlsdesc_plt only
if target_id == X86_64_ELF_DATA.
3. x86-64 has
if (s != htab->elf.srelplt)
s->reloc_count = 0;
and i386 has
s->reloc_count = 0;
i386 did have
if (s != htab->srelplt)
s->reloc_count = 0;
in the original commit:
commit 67a4f2b710581acc83afecff55424af285ecbc28
Author: Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden>
Date: Wed Jan 18 21:07:51 2006 +0000
But it was removed by
commit 5ae0bfb60a576344d7f701605346282c1144499e
Author: Richard Sandiford <address@hidden>
Date: Tue Feb 28 07:16:12 2006 +0000
bfd/
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_link_hash_table): Add
next_tls_desc_index.
(elf_i386_link_hash_table_create): Initialize it.
(elf_i386_compute_jump_table_size): Use it instead of
srelplt->reloc_count.
(allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise.
(elf_i386_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise.
(elf_i386_relocate_section): Likewise.
A later commit:
commit e1f987424b7b3f5ac63a2a6ae044a202a44b8ff8
Author: H.J. Lu <address@hidden>
Date: Fri Oct 21 15:13:37 2011 +0000
Put IRELATIVE relocations after JUMP_SLOT.
bfd/
2011-10-21 H.J. Lu <address@hidden>
PR ld/13302
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_link_hash_table): Add
next_jump_slot_index
and next_irelative_index.
(elf_i386_link_hash_table_create): Initialize
next_jump_slot_index
and next_irelative_index.
(elf_i386_allocate_dynrelocs): Increment reloc_count instead of
next_tls_desc_index.
(elf_i386_size_dynamic_sections): Set next_tls_desc_index and
next_irelative_index from reloc_count.
(elf_i386_finish_dynamic_symbol): Put R_386_IRELATIVE after
R_386_JUMP_SLOT.
changed it back to use reloc_count again. So it is correct to use
if (s != htab->elf.srelplt)
s->reloc_count = 0;
for both i386 and x86-64 now.
4. i386 and x86-64 use different DT_XXXs. They are handled by adding
them to elf_x86_link_hash_table.
With these changes, we can share _bfd_x86_elf_size_dynamic_sections in
elf32-i386.c and elf64-x86-64.c.
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_convert_load): Renamed to ...
(_bfd_i386_elf_convert_load): This. Remove static.
(elf_i386_size_dynamic_sections): Removed.
(elf_backend_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_convert_load): Renamed to ...
(_bfd_x86_64_elf_convert_load): This. Remove static.
(elf_x86_64_size_dynamic_sections): Removed.
(elf_backend_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise.
* elfxx-x86.c (_bfd_x86_elf_allocate_dynrelocs): Renamed to ...
(elf_x86_allocate_dynrelocs): This. Make it static.
(_bfd_x86_elf_allocate_local_dynrelocs): Renamed to ...
(elf_x86_allocate_local_dynreloc): This. Make it static.
(elf_i386_is_reloc_section): New function.
(elf_x86_64_is_reloc_section): Likewise.
(_bfd_x86_elf_link_hash_table_create): Initialize convert_load,
is_reloc_section, dt_reloc, dt_reloc_sz and dt_reloc_ent.
Rearrange got_entry_size initialization.
(_bfd_x86_elf_size_dynamic_sections): New function.
* elfxx-x86.h (elf_x86_link_hash_table): Add convert_load,
is_reloc_section, dt_reloc, dt_reloc_sz and dt_reloc_ent.
(_bfd_i386_elf_convert_load): New.
(_bfd_x86_64_elf_convert_load): Likewise.
(_bfd_x86_elf_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise.
(elf_backend_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise.
(_bfd_x86_elf_allocate_dynrelocs): Removed.
(_bfd_x86_elf_allocate_local_dynrelocs): Likewise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug binutils/13302] IRELATIVE relocation should come last,
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <=