[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod
From: |
fche at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:30:37 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075
--- Comment #16 from Frank Ch. Eigler <fche at redhat dot com> ---
Sorry about the confusion, it was mine.
Yeah, libbfd.so's dependencies are small, adding debuginfod (=> libcurl) would
make it rather larger. OTOH elfutils-libs are on systems already, so the
dependencies would not make system install images larger.
As an architectural question, I suspect it'd be more of an objdump side change
rather than a bfd one, given that bfd doesn't deal with source code.
(OTOH bfd/opencls.c has debuginfod-analogous lookup (hard-coding the
/usr/lib/.build-id/XXX convention). It could fall back to a debuginfod query
via spawning an external debuginfod-find process, if the EXTRA_DEBUG_ROOT1
searches fail. Any idea why we thought putting the code into binutils/dwarf.c
instead was the right place for the hook?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, mliska at suse dot cz, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, mark at klomp dot org, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, fche at redhat dot com, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod,
fche at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/11
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/15
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/17
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/18
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/18
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/25
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/26
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/26