Re: A request to add information on gprofng

[Ruud van der Pas]

Hi Nick,

> Makes sense to me.

Thanks.

> No - you would be the first. :-)

:-) We could do some trailblazing here. If it works out well, others
may want to follow.

> Well unless you count the online documentation which is really just
> an HTML formatted copy of the .texi files found in the sources.

I saw this too.

We do have an HTML formatted directory for the gprofng user guide as well,
but perhaps we should include it with the major update I plan to do
after my vacation (in the second half of August). I've already started
working on this.

> You can do either.  But I am totally OK with you having a sub-directorty
> below the sourceware binutils main web directory.

That is awesome and I think Kurt will agree :-)

Thanks very much, Nick!

Kind regards, Ruud