[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/29527] New: x86: ambiguous operands silently accepted in AT&T m
From: |
jbeulich at suse dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/29527] New: x86: ambiguous operands silently accepted in AT&T mode |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Aug 2022 09:35:20 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29527
Bug ID: 29527
Summary: x86: ambiguous operands silently accepted in AT&T mode
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jbeulich at suse dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Note the warnings on the first three insns but their absence on the latter ones
(sizing suffixes ought to be used to disambiguate):
neg (%rax)
not (%rax)
nop (%rax)
movsx (%rax), %ax
movsx (%rax), %eax
movsx (%rax), %rax
movzx (%rax), %ax
movzx (%rax), %eax
movzx (%rax), %rax
cvtsi2ss (%rax), %xmm0
vcvtsi2ss (%rax), %xmm0, %xmm0
vcvtusi2ss (%rax), %xmm0, %xmm0
For MOVSX / MOVZX the first case each is the only one where going silently is
reasonable, as a 16-bit source is very unlikely to be meant (albeit possible to
encode).
Patches addressing these were posted previously, but rejected for questionable
reasons.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gas/29527] New: x86: ambiguous operands silently accepted in AT&T mode,
jbeulich at suse dot com <=