[Bug binutils/31327] libbacktrace test failures

[nickc at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31327

--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> OK, I get what's happening here. 
> 
> This ended up being
> https://github.com/ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace/issues/118 which is fixed
> upstream.
> 
> Nick, or Ian, could we sync the version in binutils-gdb.git with upstream
> please? I am happy to do it with permission too.

I can.  But I would rather one of the GDB global maintainers did it, since gdb
is the consumer of libbacktrace.  If you do not get a response from them
however please ping me and I will take care of it.


(In reply to Ian Taylor from comment #3)
> I don't know if there is any binutils policy about this.

I think that we should consider libbacktrace to be the same as libiberty or
config.  Ie something that we sync from gcc.  In fact we should probably add
that to the top-level MAINTAINERS file...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.