[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included
From: |
Michael Beattie |
Subject: |
Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:52:03 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 07:11:39PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> i) self-contained static compilation
> ii) berkeleyDB in /usr/local/BerkeleyDBX_X
> iii) openssl in /usr/local/ssl
BAD. I dont know of any Linux distributions that dont supply these in
/usr
> Anyone volunteering? I've enough other stuff to do...
High on my TODO list for this week (No. 2 after something a little more
pressing).
Mike.
--
Michael Beattie <address@hidden>
- 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Jo B. Grasmo, 2002/04/19
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, David Masterson, 2002/04/19
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/19
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included,
Michael Beattie <=
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/22
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Mark . Burgess, 2002/04/22
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, David Masterson, 2002/04/22
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Tim Auckland, 2002/04/22
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/22
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23
- Re: 2.0.1 configure fails on FreeBSD, patch included, Michael Beattie, 2002/04/23