[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
coreutils-6.3: c89 patch insufficent
From: |
Michael Deutschmann |
Subject: |
coreutils-6.3: c89 patch insufficent |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:21:28 -0700 (PDT) |
coreutils-6.3 includes a patch, c99-to-c89.diff, to allow it to be
compiled on platforms that don't support declarations after statements.
However, this patch is not sufficent -- I had to fix two other areas to
get coreutils to compile under GCC 2.95.3.
I've appended my fixes. They are to be applied after the existing
c99-to-c89.diff.
---- Michael Deutschmann <address@hidden>
diff -durpN coreutils-6.3/src/remove.c coreutils-6.3-fix/src/remove.c
--- coreutils-6.3/src/remove.c 2006-10-01 02:53:43.000000000 -0700
+++ coreutils-6.3-fix/src/remove.c 2006-10-01 02:53:17.000000000 -0700
@@ -1360,8 +1360,9 @@ remove_dir (int fd_cwd, Dirstack_state *
But that's no big deal since we're interactive. */
struct stat empty_st;
Ternary is_empty;
+ enum RM_status s;
cache_stat_init (&empty_st);
- enum RM_status s = prompt (fd, ds, empty_dir, &empty_st, x,
+ s = prompt (fd, ds, empty_dir, &empty_st, x,
PA_REMOVE_DIR, &is_empty);
if (s != RM_OK)
diff -durpN coreutils-6.3/src/shred.c coreutils-6.3-fix/src/shred.c
--- coreutils-6.3/src/shred.c 2006-09-02 23:38:54.000000000 -0700
+++ coreutils-6.3-fix/src/shred.c 2006-10-01 02:53:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ dopass (int fd, char const *qname, off_t
out. Thus, it shouldn't give up on bad blocks. This
code works because lim is always a multiple of
SECTOR_SIZE, except at the end. */
- verify (sizeof r % SECTOR_SIZE == 0);
+ {verify (sizeof r % SECTOR_SIZE == 0);}
if (errnum == EIO && 0 <= size && (soff | SECTOR_MASK) < lim)
{
size_t soff1 = (soff | SECTOR_MASK) + 1;
- coreutils-6.3: c89 patch insufficent,
Michael Deutschmann <=