[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coreutils 6.3 on Tru64 - just plain broken, or...?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: coreutils 6.3 on Tru64 - just plain broken, or...? |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:06:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
mwoehlke <address@hidden> writes:
> things went badly until I removed the #define for
> intmax_t from config.h.
That's not a good sign. In what way did they go badly, exactly? What
diagnostics did you get?
> shuf builds, but the linker complains about 'ftello unresolved', and
> then *produces a file* (but without +x), with the result that 'make'
> then thinks it has nothing to do to for target 'shuf' and continues on
> to "success" if re-run.
I'll address this via separate email.
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/install/gnu/src/coreutils-6.3/tests/cp'
> PASS: src-base-dot
> ./sparse: 343414 Memory fault
> ./sparse: 343422 Memory fault
> ./sparse: failure in testing framework
> FAIL: sparse
To get more info for failures like this, please try this:
cd /home/install/gnu/src/coreutils-6.3/tests/cp
VERBOSE=yes make check TESTS=sparse
- coreutils 6.3 on Tru64 - just plain broken, or...?, mwoehlke, 2006/10/03
- Re: coreutils 6.3 on Tru64 - just plain broken, or...?,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: coreutils 6.3 on Tru64 - just plain broken, or...?, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/04
- Re: coreutils 6.3 on Tru64 - just plain broken, or...?, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/04