[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: du feature request
From: |
Logan Hansen |
Subject: |
Re: du feature request |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:03:48 -0600 (MDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8 |
'sort'ing by name isn't a big deal. 'sort'ing by size, however doesn't
work well do to du's rounding of sizes: du -m and compare a file that's 1k
vs 900k. Further, du -h is quite nice, however, 'sort' can't do *anything*
with the results. Rather than having to write a program to parse du -k's
output, sort it, and then make it 'human readable', this would work *much*
better as a builtin option.
Logan
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Logan Hansen on 10/19/2006 12:10 PM:
>> Sirs,
>>
>> I would like to request a feature to be added to the 'du' command:
>>
>> a command line switch to sort output by directory name or by size of
>> directory
>
> Why? What can we add to du that can't already be done by pipelining du
> output into sort?
>
> This FAQ explains the philosophy of the coreutils:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#Why-don_0027t-the-utilities-have-built-in-directory-recursion_003f
>
> - --
> Life is short - so eat dessert first!
>
> Eric Blake address@hidden
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
> Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFFOB9W84KuGfSFAYARAo5QAKC8WtjJHtMAbhqM5/9lWk4uMejuOwCcDbIc
> e1hlGX3EUesWdTZVPdGdeLw=
> =8tOJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>