[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64 |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Dec 2008 18:05:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hello, and sorry for the delay,
* Daniel Richard G. wrote on Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:49:19AM CET:
>
> Anyway, I was playing around with this a bit more. The compiler is choking
> somewhere inside the #include<signal.h> at the top of sig2str.c.
This was already fixed, thanks!
[...]
> Everything else builds fine. Although I did run into one curious Make error
> (using /usr/bin/make):
>
> ----begin build log excerpt----
> rm -f t-ref-del.sed ref-del.sed
> sed -e '/^#/d' -e 's/@''PACKAGE''@/coreutils/g' ref-del.sin > t-ref-del.sed
> mv t-ref-del.sed ref-del.sed
> Making all in src
> Make: bad lock name: chcon chgrp chown chmod cp dd dircolors du ginstall
> link
> ln dir vdir ls mkdir mkfifo mknod mktemp mv nohup readlink rm rmdir shred
> stat
> sync touch unlink cat cksum comm csplit cut expand fmt fold head join groups
> md5sum nl od paste pr ptx sha1sum sha224sum sha256sum sha384sum sha512sum
> shuf
> sort split sum tac tail tr tsort unexpand uniq wc basename date dirname echo
> env expr factor false id kill logname pathchk printenv printf pwd runcon seq
> sleep tee test timeout true truncate tty whoami yes base64. Stop.
> *** Exit 1
> Stop.
> *** Exit 1
> Stop.
> ----end build log excerpt----
>
> GNU Make got through that without a problem, but... should gmake be a
> prerequisite for building coreutils?
Oh well. OSF make chokes upon instances of '[' in the Makefile; it
seems to use it as some internal separator for locks or so.
Jim, it may be possible that the comment deleted in d9903062cf might
have hinted towards this; but it mentioned problems with the shell
rather than with make, and anyway I don't see how OSF make could have
correctly interpreted the file before the change.
I guess the easiest would be to require gmake on Tru64/OSF, the only
other choice I see is to fully remove all instances of [ from target
and dependency lists (thus only rename it at install time), which would
be rather cumbersome.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: Bug in autoconf 2.62 with old GNU awk, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bug in autoconf 2.62 with old GNU awk, Jim Meyering, 2008/12/13
- RE: Bug in autoconf 2.62 with old GNU awk, Daniel Richard G., 2008/12/13
- timespec declaration issue on Tru64 (was: Bug in autoconf 2.62 with old GNU awk), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/12/14
- Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/14
- RE: timespec declaration issue on Tru64, Daniel Richard G., 2008/12/14
- Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/14
- RE: timespec declaration issue on Tru64, Daniel Richard G., 2008/12/14
- Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/15
- Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64, Bruno Haible, 2008/12/21
- Re: timespec declaration issue on Tru64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/12/21
RE: Bug in autoconf 2.62 with old GNU awk, Daniel Richard G., 2008/12/13