[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8103: NUL terminated lines
From: |
Bjartur Thorlacius |
Subject: |
bug#8103: NUL terminated lines |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:19:40 +0000 |
On 2/24/11, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>>> Maybe we should modify tac to add the -z option. Would you care to
>> write a patch?
>> It would be redundant, as tac -s $'\0' is equivalent.
>
> Are you using a non-GNU version of tac?
I don't remember whether I was using FreeBSD or GNU tac.
> If so, please tell us which one -- that may influence
> the decision of whether to make "-s ''" work or to add -z.
>
> With GNU tac, that has never worked:
>
> $ tac -s ''
> tac: separator cannot be empty
>
NUL!=the empty string.
> Making -s accommodate an empty string argument is a possibility,
> but that change looks like it'd be relatively disruptive.
>
I don't understand what that would do. Self-delimited strings would be
quite disruptive, indeed, but I gather that's not what you're talking
about.
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Bjartur Thorlacius, 2011/02/23
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines,
Bjartur Thorlacius <=
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Bjartur Thorlacius, 2011/02/25
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/25
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/25
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Eric Blake, 2011/02/25
- bug#8103: NUL terminated lines, Alan Curry, 2011/02/24