[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:10:23 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 |
On 02/27/2012 03:50 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this! Some nits:
>
> On 02/27/2012 07:20 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> +is_nul (const char* buf, size_t bufsize)
>
> The usual spacing style is "const char *buf", since the
> "*" really belongs to the "buf" in C.
>
>> + memset (obuf + output_blocksize, 1, sizeof (uintptr_t));
>
> This constraint on OUTPUT_BLOCK_SLOP should be documented, thus:
>
> #define OUTPUT_BLOCK_SLOP MAX (sizeof (uintptr_t), page_size - 1)
>
>> + /* write sentinel to slop after the buffer,
>> + to allow efficient checking for NUL blocks. */
>
> Initial cap for sentence. The next comment has a similar issue.
>
Thanks Paul. Adjustments made.
I'm also thinking I should warn once when
the new lseek fails, but only after the fall back
write() succeeds.
cheers,
Pádraig.
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/27
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/27
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag,
Pádraig Brady <=
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/27
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/27
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/27
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/28
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/28
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/28
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Paul Eggert, 2012/02/28
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Pádraig Brady, 2012/02/28
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Roman Rybalko, 2012/02/28
- bug#9157: [PATCH] dd: sparse conv flag, Jim Meyering, 2012/02/28