Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -o

bug-findutils

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -o

From:	jidanni
Subject:	Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older
Date:	Sun, 22 Sep 2013 06:49:15 +0800

P.S. odd how one is forced to search Google
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Re%3A+Can%27t+say+%22up+to+and+including%22+with+-newer+without+a+symmetrical+-older%22
for the original message, given the headers I received.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older, James Youngman, 2013/09/21
- Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older, jidanni, 2013/09/21
  - Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older, James Youngman, 2013/09/21
    - Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older, jidanni, 2013/09/21
- Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older, jidanni <=

Prev by Date: Re: docs for "--execdir" confusing
Next by Date: Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older
Previous by thread: Re: Can't say "up to and including" with -newer without a symmetrical -older
Next by thread: [bug #39324] exits without error on OOM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread