[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
Marcelo Dias de Toledo |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 22:43:48 -0300 |
Kai =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gro=DFjohann?= writes:
> eliz@is.elta.co.il (Eli Zaretskii) writes:
>
> > The issue here is that there's no such thing as "FSF Emacs". It's
> > usually a term used by people who have derogatory attitude towards GNU
> > Emacs; thus Richard's comment, especially since the rest of your message
> > did sound quite angry.
>
> I presume it was not meant that way. The OP didn't know that "FSF
> Emacs" is derogatory, and didn't intend to put off anyone with his
> (her?) wording.
You know what's funny ? Bob Glickstein know a lot about GNU Emacs, he
actualy wrote a book about it and *HE* created a project called FSF
Emacs in advogato.org. Check
it. http://www.advogato.org/proj/FSF%20Emacs/ Really weird.
--
Marcelo Dias de Toledo
mailto:mtole@ig.com.br
http://rw.locked.org
Mobile: 55 71 9141-7181
- Re: Futile bug reports?, (continued)
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Tom Tromey, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Peter S Galbraith, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/08/09
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
Marcelo Dias de Toledo <=
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/11
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/12
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Stein A. Strømme, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/13
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/14
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Raymond Zeitler, 2001/08/15
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/17
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman, 2001/08/15