[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gplv3 files and updates
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: gplv3 files and updates |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jul 2007 04:47:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Karl Berry wrote:
> I've never understood that "trick" (even though you've explained it to
> me before, sorry).
It is documented in the README, in more detail in doc/gnulib-intro.texi, and
you find the motivation in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2004-09/msg00131.html
> On the face of it, it does not seem legal.
Why not? Who could be hurt by us writing "GPL" on some files which are
really LGPL and of which we all know that they are LGPL?
Bruno
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/07/01
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Paul Eggert, 2007/07/03
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Patrice Dumas, 2007/07/03
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/03
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Paul Eggert, 2007/07/04
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/05
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/07/05
- Re: gplv3 files and updates,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/07/06
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/06
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/07/06
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Brett Smith, 2007/07/07
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/07/07
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Paul Eggert, 2007/07/12
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/07/12
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Simon Josefsson, 2007/07/13
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Paul Eggert, 2007/07/13
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Eric Blake, 2007/07/13