[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:08:35 +0200 |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Please revert those changes.
>
> Reverted. Sorry, I thought the were straightforward and in line with what
> you would agree to.
Thanks.
No hard feelings, of course.
The patches are probably ok, but I won't have time to deal with
this (adding the tests I mentioned) for a couple more days.
I prefer not to leave gnulib and coreutils out of sync like that.
> Sorry again; I interpreted your words as hesitation regarding the human.c
> part. I thought Paul would speak up within two days.
When it comes to interface changes, it seems only fair to wait at
least until all parties concerned have signed off on a proposed patch.
- Re: xstrtol.h, (continued)
- Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Eric Blake, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Ben Pfaff, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/22
- Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/25
- human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/07/26
- Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/07/26
- Re: human interface change?!? [Re: xstrtol.h,
Jim Meyering <=
Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Eric Blake, 2007/07/19
Re: POTFILES.in updates?, Karl Berry, 2007/07/23