[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:56:47 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080421 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 6/22/2008 1:58 PM:
| I don't understand the "Due to autoconf conventions". We are not using
| HAVE_SIGACTION as a #define in config.h. We are using it as a shell
variable.
| This shell variable is not set by either AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([sigaction])
| nor by AC_CHECK_TYPE(...). So there is no conflict.
I see your point. AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([sigaction]) indeed sets the config.h
preprocessor variable HAVE_SIGACTION, and I omitted
AC_CHECK_TYPE([sigaction]) because it would also produce HAVE_SIGACTION;
but in config.h.in, we used only @HAVE_SIGACTION@, which is set independently.
|
| Proposed comment change:
|
| *** lib/signal.in.h.orig 2008-06-22 21:55:31.000000000 +0200
| --- 118,125 ----
| typedef struct siginfo_t siginfo_t;
| # endif /* address@hidden@ */
|
| ! /* We assume that platforms which lack the sigaction() function also lack
| ! the 'struct sigaction' type, and vice versa. */
Fine.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkhfj38ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYC83wCdGnKSl3ah1Hzwlqt1Iwl9ASl2
fCQAoMCGrOvZbSeQ1beWwn3nwLIEq7FS
=tEj2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, (continued)
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/19
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/19
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Paul Eggert, 2008/06/20
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/20
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/20
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/21
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/22
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/23
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Eric Blake, 2008/06/23
- Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN, Bruno Haible, 2008/06/23
POSIX in docs [was: RFC: sigaction module], Eric Blake, 2008/06/17