[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:59:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Hello Yoann,
> I'm wondering whether there is a problem with the last set of patch I
> sent you on the mailing list, that may prevent you from checking them
> in?
Sorry, I had zero time from Friday to Monday.
Your patch looks quite good. Thanks for the many updates. (Only the test-lock
part has useless reformatting.)
But the major points I'm still hesitating about are:
- What about the module for the sched_yield function, which is mandatory
for code that runs with GNU Pth? Do you write it, or should I write it?
- 'gl' prefix of the module names? I vote for no, since all modules are
gnulib modules, and it's thus redundant.
- 'gl' prefix of the header files? You are right that because of
Solaris <thread.h> "it make sense to use glcond / gllock to use the same
convention everywhere". But I have a bad feeling about such a renaming.
Can you see alternatives? Maybe something like <glthread/lock.h>,
<glthread/tls.h>, <glthread/thread.h>, <glthread/cond.h>,
<glthread/yield.h> ?
Bruno
- Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2008/08/13
- Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules, Bruno Haible, 2008/08/14
- Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules, Bruno Haible, 2008/08/17
- Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules, Bruno Haible, 2008/08/17
- Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules, Bruno Haible, 2008/08/17
- Re: checkin of glthread/glcond modules, Bruno Haible, 2008/08/17