[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ld-output-def
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: ld-output-def |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:07:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> OK, now we know why your module is useful. Please please mention these
> alternatives and why they suck in the documentation.
Good idea -- I learned something from this, and it is useful to document
why we use a particular solution. It may be that there are alternatives
that are better than --output-def, and if so I'd like to learn them. If
we mention the arguments for and against various solutions, people with
more insight can refute them if they are incorrect.
I'll propose an updated patch next.
/Simon
- Re: ld-output-def, (continued)
- Re: ld-output-def, Eric Blake, 2009/04/01
- Re: ld-output-def, Simon Josefsson, 2009/04/01
- Re: ld-output-def, Eric Blake, 2009/04/01
- Re: ld-output-def, Simon Josefsson, 2009/04/01
- Re: ld-output-def, Eric Blake, 2009/04/01
- Re: ld-output-def, Simon Josefsson, 2009/04/01
- Re: ld-output-def, Eric Blake, 2009/04/01
- Re: ld-output-def, Simon Josefsson, 2009/04/01
Re: ld-output-def, Simon Josefsson, 2009/04/01
Re: ld-output-def,
Simon Josefsson <=
Re: ld-output-def, Simon Josefsson, 2009/04/01