[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:44:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> > So, any objections to removing this module?
>
> Why don't we first mark it as obsolete?
> I'll stop using it in coreutils right away, and we can
> remove it altogether after a reasonable grace period.
OK, I've committed the cross-compilation fix and done that:
2009-04-10 Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
Mark 'utime' obsolete.
* modules/utime (Status, Notice): New sections.
Suggested by Jim Meyering.
*** modules/utime.orig 2009-04-10 19:42:58.000000000 +0200
--- modules/utime 2009-04-10 19:42:39.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 1,6 ****
--- 1,12 ----
Description:
utime() function: change access and/or modification times of a file.
+ Status:
+ obsolete
+
+ Notice:
+ This module is obsolete. It can be removed on 2010-01-01.
+
Files:
lib/utime.c
m4/utimbuf.m4
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, (continued)
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Bruno Haible, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paul Eggert, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Eric Blake, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Jim Meyering, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Bruno Haible, 2009/04/09
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/04/10
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes, Jim Meyering, 2009/04/10
- Re: touch gets stuck for named pipes,
Bruno Haible <=