[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test. |
Date: |
Tue, 26 May 2009 15:27:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> According to Simon Josefsson on 5/26/2009 6:48 AM:
>> I'm not sure, it isn't clear that this particular strstr problem is a
>> common problem.
>>
>> I think the first step is to add this to the self-test. If we get
>> reports about it, we can try to learn which platforms and versions are
>> affected, and decide whether if it is worth to replace the system's
>> strstr where it fails in this way. What do you think?
>
> Yes, adding to the test is a good first step, and we can use the feedback
> to decide how much else we might need to do. Is the bug also present in
> gnulib's strstr replacement?
I don't know -- I have already upgraded to a newer glibc on my machine.
/Simon
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Bruno Haible, 2009/05/26
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26
- required memchr behavior (was: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.), Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Matthew Woehlke, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Matthew Woehlke, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Eric Blake, 2009/05/29
- Re: required memchr behavior, Jim Meyering, 2009/05/30
- Re: required memchr behavior (was: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.), Bruno Haible, 2009/05/31
- Re: required memchr behavior, Jim Meyering, 2009/05/31
- Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test.,
Simon Josefsson <=
Re: [PATCH] tests/test-strstr.c: Add another self-test., Eric Blake, 2009/05/26