[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: acl, copy-file: First step towards more consistent function names
|
From: |
Collin Funk |
|
Subject: |
Re: acl, copy-file: First step towards more consistent function names |
|
Date: |
Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:10:44 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi Bruno,
Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> writes:
> In the name of consistency of the API, I'd like to migrate 'acl' and
> 'copy-file'
> to the common conventions: In a first step
> qcopy_acl — xcopy_acl
>
> and then later (in a year or two):
> copy_acl — xcopy_acl
>
> At some point, we can then also rename the modules accordingly.
I agree with your preference. Looks good to me, thanks!
Collin