[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock hit 3rd place on AMO
From: |
Narcis Garcia |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock hit 3rd place on AMO |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Dec 2016 19:16:49 +0100 |
Do you mean this extension?
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/adblock-plus/
If so; Can you install it from that FF page?
El 28/12/16 a les 18:14, address@hidden ha escrit:
> I really like spyblock. it just works and I don't have to worry about
> ublock that's constantly being aggressively shilled everywhere like
> linux mint. please let me just keep my spyblock.
>
> --
> Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
> https://tutanota.com
>
> 21. Dec 2016 12:40 by address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>:
>
> On 2016-12-21 18:34, Sedov Andrey wrote:
>
> I'm not arguing that a high rating is more donations. More donations
> is the best development software. But the betrayal of the idea Adblock = this
> betrayal.
>
> I said that uBlock Origin refuse to take donations. The author,
> Raymond Hill, is against it, thus nobody can sue him as they tried
> with the Adblock Plus company Eyeo.
>
>
> I think that GNU's fair. Adblock is not fair. I think people are
> coasting (old information) make a choice Adblock.
> But over time more people will use uBlock Origin and less use of
> Adblock. And ratings for AMO Adblock will decrease uBlock Origin will improve
> (heh... I know I'm naive and idealist:) )
> So I think that the way IceCat SpyBlock is the way with uBlock
> Origin, but not the path with the traitor Adblock.
>
>
> If you have a Savannah account, then please put your vote on
> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49606 (click on "Votes" at the bottom
> of the page).
>
>
> 21.12.2016 23:55, David Hedlund пишет:
>
> The AMO popularity rank is a key factor in making a good
> decision. uBlock Origin refuse to take donations so this
> cannot be profitable for the devs.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>