|
From: | awakeyet |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] uBlock hit 3rd place on AMO |
Date: | Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:08:06 +0100 (CET) |
Do you mean this extension?
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/adblock-plus
If so; Can you install it from that FF page?
El 28/12/16 a les 18:14, address@hidden ha escrit:I really like spyblock. it just works and I don't have to worry about
ublock that's constantly being aggressively shilled everywhere like
linux mint. please let me just keep my spyblock.
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
21. Dec 2016 12:40 by address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>:
On 2016-12-21 18:34, Sedov Andrey wrote:
I'm not arguing that a high rating is more donations. More donations is the best development software. But the betrayal of the idea Adblock = this betrayal.
I said that uBlock Origin refuse to take donations. The author,
Raymond Hill, is against it, thus nobody can sue him as they tried
with the Adblock Plus company Eyeo.
I think that GNU's fair. Adblock is not fair. I think people are coasting (old information) make a choice Adblock.
But over time more people will use uBlock Origin and less use of Adblock. And ratings for AMO Adblock will decrease uBlock Origin will improve (heh... I know I'm naive and idealist:) )
So I think that the way IceCat SpyBlock is the way with uBlock Origin, but not the path with the traitor Adblock.
If you have a Savannah account, then please put your vote on
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49606 (click on "Votes" at the bottom
of the page).
21.12.2016 23:55, David Hedlund пишет:
The AMO popularity rank is a key factor in making a good
decision. uBlock Origin refuse to take donations so this
cannot be profitable for the devs.
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |