Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat browser default on Windows 7?

[Narcis Garcia]

IceCat 45 must have vulnerabilities too, and then someone will ask for
Icecat 52, etc.


El 30/12/16 a les 17:44, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
> Numerous remote code execution vulnerabilities? You're kidding me right?
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> 
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:06:10 +0100, Narcis Garcia <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> People asking for a new IceCat version for Windows, they already have
>> IceCat 38.8.0 ans it seems usable.
>> Any freedom and security enhancement they ask for, it's to GNU/Linux
>> direction.
>>
>>
>> El 29/12/16 a les 23:58, Daniel Quintiliani ha escrit:
>>> I think there's been a real problem lately where complaints by users are 
>>> being confused with official project decisions. Like when v45.5 and v45.3 
>>> were released Linux only, some of us asked if a Windows version would be 
>>> available, and it turned into arguments about whether we should expand 
>>> non-DRM browsers under unfree systems. Instead of arguments we need to 
>>> focus on the project and official policy vs mailing list opinions. We 
>>> should also focus on who the decision makers actually are, to my knowledge 
>>> Ruben has been busy lately but someone can easily say "Why should we 
>>> maintain a Windows or Mac version of IceCat?" and be confused for someone 
>>> who is making decisions for the project.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> -Dan Q
>>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:03:32 -0800, Gary Driggs <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ruben having discontinued Windows support for IceCat was the best and 
>>>>> easiest way to force most of the human population into DRM.
>>>>
>>>> Where did you see any such announcement?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we should start an alternate mailing list, address@hidden, so the 
>>>> rest of us can discuss technical topics in peace.
>>>> --
>>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
> 
>