|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation |
Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:18:16 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Il 10/02/2014 10:00, address@hidden ha scritto:
> > > > The documentation for 'grep' attempts to address this issue, perhaps not > > as clearly as it could. Maybe the installation instructions should talk > > about it as well, and suggest --with-included-regex for people who care > > about this sort of thing.> > Yeah, that makes sense. I will revert the commit.I think this is the wrong course of action. Paul suggested updating the doc to be more clear, not reverting the code.
If you use --with-included-regex, the patch is a no-op. Thus it can be reverted.
Personally, I think grep should always use the included regex so that then the behavior is consistent across all platforms everywhere; this is why gawk always uses its own regex.
I wouldn't be surprised if GNU distros patch gawk's regex away to get consistency with grep, sed, etc.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |