[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gtypist] GTypist 2.9 package
From: |
Daniel Leidert |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gtypist] GTypist 2.9 package |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:50:15 +0100 |
Hi Felix,
Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> Daniel Leidert <address@hidden> writes:
> > Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 09:31 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> >> hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> there is a small problem with your gtypist 2.9 package: Why do you depend
> >> on
> >> libncurses?
> >
> > The package depends on libncursesw5 not libncurses5.
>
> I think it depends on both (from http://packages.debian.org/sid/gtypist).
What you see is, that for some architectures version 2.9 has not yet
been built. On those architectures, gtypist 2.8.x depends on ncurses5.
Just wait a few days until gtypist has been built on all architectures
and uploaded and then you'll only see ncursesw as dependency on this
site.
> > The configure script checks for it and prefers ncursesw over ncurses.
[..]
> >> if test -n "$HAVE_NCURSESW_H" -a -n "$HAVE_LIBNCURSESW"; then
> >> LIBS="-lncursesw $LIBS"
[..]
> Yes, the comments are useless and I'have just commited a change to
> remove this from git.
Saw it. But the code above, which you left, is also not necessary.
AC_CHECK_LIB adds -lncursesw to $LIBS automatically if libncursesw is
available :) See the autoconf documentation.
[snip]
> > BTW: If your related to gtypist upstream sources, would you mind
> > checking out the open bug reports here:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/src:gtypist
>
> Yes, sure, we have taken care of most of them already, but we should
> definitely close all of them ASAP.
Thanks for the explanation. I'll handle those being my part :) with the
next upload. Might take a few days.
Regards, Daniel