Re: segfault if gc during backtrace

[Michael Livshin]

Bill Schottstaedt <address@hidden> writes:

> If I add this at line 567 in backtrace.c (just after the 
> scm_make_print_state):
> 
>  scm_protect_object(print_state);
> 
> the program works fine, but of course that isn't the "right thing".

it's quite close, actually.

I'll check in a fix shortly.

thanks for the _wonderful_ report,
--mike

-- 
Perhaps it IS a good day to die; I say we ship it!
                                        -- Klingon Programmer