Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch

[Claes Wallin]

Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Claes Wallin <address@hidden> writes:
>> It seems that isinf is c99, and that earlier gcc:s supported it in isoc
>> as a GNU extension. If we're using c99, why not specify it? What good
>> things will be turned off?
> 
> Every time I've had the misfortune to experiment with standards-modes
> on headers or whatever it's been painful.  I think _POSIX_SOURCE
> losing all GNU extras was the most recent bad bit in guile.

Yes. Turned out that -std=c99 turned asm() off. I will hit myself over
the head if I try drawing conclusions without a clean tree ever again..

-std=gnu99 worked, or changing those asm() to __asm().

> Is isinf missed on solaris?  Is there another way to ask for it?

isinf is contained in an '#ifdef _STD_C99' section.


Status this weekend:

Solaris 10 with 'CFLAGS=-O2 -std=gnu99' passed all tests including
regexp.test with following changes:

* Updated HAVE_ALLOCA_H blocks in libguile/eval.c libguile/filesys.c
* Check for HAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP in libguile/threads.c
* Tests using scm_boot_guile instead of scm_init_guile
* <string.h> in libguile/threads.c
* Addition of version.texi in doc/ref/ and doc/tutorial/
* { PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT } in libguile/threads-pthreads.h
* Check for HAVE_DECL_SETHOSTNAME libguile/posix.c

Mac OS X with 'CFLAGS=-O2' passed all tests except regexp test with:

* HAVE_PTHREAD_GETATTR_NP
* init -> boot
* version.texi

Mac OS X also accepted the Solaris 10 patches without any additional
problems.

   /c

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature