[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:51:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Gregory Marton <address@hidden> writes:
> Having done these steps, it did indeed make check, and with the
> --without-threads flag, it even passed the timeout tests!
You mean that the problem that triggered this thread vanished?
> I'm happy with this for now. Is non-threading ever likely to be
> unsupported?
There's no plan to remove mono-threading AFAIK.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/06
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/07
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Neil Jerram, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/17
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/18
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Gregory Marton, 2008/07/18
- Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/07/18
- Re: with-timeout and asynchronous alarm (was: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?), Gregory Marton, 2008/07/18