Re: let-values* generates Unbound variable

[Judy Hawkins]

> Unbound variable: let-values*

So, in answer to my own question, it appears that my previous post is reporting 
a documentation bug, as using the spelling let*-values works just dandy:

guile> (let*-values (((x y) (values 1 2)) ((n m) (values (+ x x) (+ y y)))) 
(list n m))
(2 4)


In the reference manual for 1.8.5, searching on let-values gets me the 
following:


*(srfi srfi-11)*
     Multiple-value handling with `let-values' and `let-values*' (*note
     SRFI-11::).

----------- and in ------------------------------------------------

File: guile.info,  Node: SRFI-11,  Next: SRFI-13,  Prev: SRFI-10,  Up: SRFI Sup\
port

6.4.10 SRFI-11 - let-values
---------------------------

-------------- the last line reads -----------------------------

 `let-values*', on the other hand, performs the
bindings sequentially, just like `let*' does for single-valued
expressions.

---------------------------------------------------------------

(On doing one more search on let-values the net I turned up a page at  
http://docs.plt-scheme.org that put me on to trying the let*-values spelling 
which solves my immediate problem.)

Judy Hawkins