[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1
|
From: |
Hans Aberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2011 15:58:53 +0200 |
On 23 May 2011, at 15:49, Andy Wingo wrote:
>>> But, it is 1 and 2, currently. (+ FOO) inlines just to FOO, too
>>> optimistically.
>>
>> It is unspecified according to rsr5.
>
> I know. I'm talking about Guile here.
I know. You perhaps haven't described clearly enough what it should be. If
using a tuples description, you want them to be truncated to the first
component whenever possible and not using call-by-values explicitly, right?
Hans
- (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/22
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/23
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/23
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Andy Wingo, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Mark H Weaver, 2011/05/24
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/25
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Mark H Weaver, 2011/05/25
- Re: (+ (values 1 2)) should be 1, Hans Aberg, 2011/05/25